[Tyler Durden]

@D BiGGS 4162 wrote:

true, but oblivion has three endings right? that alone is enough for a replay or two. 😛

Bioshock, and not really since your character isn’t developed at all aside from the obvious twist. You never see him or hear him speak. The endings are pretty shallow and like one minute long.

[Lungzz]

The endings look good but there VERY short, especially the good one because it’s petty gay you do’t even see the lil sisters, loll, jus there hands…Which somehow look very nice, i could only imagine what there faces looked like.

Wii..Will..Wii..Will..Rock You!

[KastroX]

Do what i do…wait for it to get old or come out on platinum…then trade in games for that…You actually pay $5

Salam

My 3.52 PSP Is Now 1.5 Again...The Impossible Is Done :cool:

[D BiGGS]

@Tyler Durden 4164 wrote:

Bioshock, and not really since your character isn’t developed at all aside from the obvious twist. You never see him or hear him speak. The endings are pretty shallow and like one minute long.

right bioshock:P, but i can see where your coming from.

Still 3 lefts from making the right move;)...

[J High]

@KastroX 4179 wrote:

Do what i do…wait for it to get old or come out on platinum…then trade in games for that…You actually pay $5

Salam

lmfao!! cheap bastard

GMX on COD!...We get OURS!

[contagion]

Maybe you just didn’t explore enough. I got a ton of shit on the first way through and explored like all hell and purposely took as long as possible to best enjoy myself and the game, I could’ve just ran through in half the time but I chose not to because that’s depriving myself of a great gaming experience. Obviously I’m not alone in that opinion, just look up the Bioshock reviews at http://www.gamerankings.com. And Oblivion is SOOOO WACK. That is the most boring overrated shit I’ve ever seen in my life, hands down. And R6 being better than Gears? Please. The only people who think that are people who are terrible at Gears just like when people hate on Halo cause they suck at it or don’t have a 360. Vegas was not that great and in the end it will be Gears that will be remembered while Vegas will go down as “just another” R6 game. Gears isn’t the best selling 360 game for no reason, it’s just simply the best multiplayer game on the market. And COD4, judging from the beta is going to be the best multiplayer game for awhile once it comes out. Yes, that’s right, better than Halo 3. I wasn’t all that impressed with the beta for Halo 3 but COD4 is like a ridiculously sick modern day version of Counter-Strike.

Bioshock > Oblivion
and
COD4 > Gears > R6V

For anyone who has trouble sleeping just pick up Oblivion and play for more than 5 minutes because the combat system is about as exciting as watching grass grow.

And for anyone who doubts me on Bioshock, just go read the reviews on gamerankings.com, it’s a compilation of all the review scores for a game averaged together for an overall score. Check if more of the reviews seem to agree with my opinion or with Tyler Durdens.

[J High]

@contagion 4350 wrote:

And R6 being better than Gears? Please. The only people who think that are people who are terrible at Gears just like when people hate on Halo cause they suck at it or don’t have a 360. Vegas was not that great and in the end it will be Gears that will be remembered while Vegas will go down as “just another” R6 game. Gears isn’t the best selling 360 game for no reason, it’s just simply the best multiplayer game on the market.

I disagree, Im nice as hell on Gears but I still prefer R6V simply because I like more realistic type games…Gears is fun multiplayer online if you find the right group….4 on 4 gets boring also and the maps are too small…plus all you have to do to kill people in Gears is run right at them, dive around a little to dodge bullets and get right up on them with the shotgun and its done…R6V is much more tactical…the maps are ALOT bigger so you have to plan your attacks with your team (which makes the experience online much mroe fun)….I think R6V will be remember just liek Gears will be remembered….now if R6 outdoes itself in the next series then people might not care about Vegas anymore…but as for right now…that is one of the best online multiplayers out right now….and the main reason why Gears was the best selling game on 360 is because thats the game you heard about ALL THE TIME when the 360 came out…that was their marketing game to push the 360…and its a game you can only get for the 360….in conclusion….its all in opinion…has nothing to do with if you’re good at Gears or not…some people just dont like unrealistic shooters…im more of a tactical, work with your team, type of guy…and you cant say COD4 is better than both cuz you havnt even played the whole game…could be like a movie trailer…all the good shit is shown and then the actual thing isnt as good…thank you 😄

*steps down from podium*

GMX on COD!...We get OURS!

[Tyler Durden]

@contagion 4350 wrote:

Maybe you just didn’t explore enough. I got a ton of shit on the first way through and explored like all hell and purposely took as long as possible to best enjoy myself and the game, I could’ve just ran through in half the time but I chose not to because that’s depriving myself of a great gaming experience. Obviously I’m not alone in that opinion, just look up the Bioshock reviews at http://www.gamerankings.com. And Oblivion is SOOOO WACK. That is the most boring overrated shit I’ve ever seen in my life, hands down. And R6 being better than Gears? Please. The only people who think that are people who are terrible at Gears just like when people hate on Halo cause they suck at it or don’t have a 360. Vegas was not that great and in the end it will be Gears that will be remembered while Vegas will go down as “just another” R6 game. Gears isn’t the best selling 360 game for no reason, it’s just simply the best multiplayer game on the market. And COD4, judging from the beta is going to be the best multiplayer game for awhile once it comes out. Yes, that’s right, better than Halo 3. I wasn’t all that impressed with the beta for Halo 3 but COD4 is like a ridiculously sick modern day version of Counter-Strike.

Bioshock > Oblivion
and
COD4 > Gears > R6V

For anyone who has trouble sleeping just pick up Oblivion and play for more than 5 minutes because the combat system is about as exciting as watching grass grow.

And for anyone who doubts me on Bioshock, just go read the reviews on gamerankings.com, it’s a compilation of all the review scores for a game averaged together for an overall score. Check if more of the reviews seem to agree with my opinion or with Tyler Durdens.

1.You climax over the game doesnt mean I do.
2.Did explore, still not that expansive as you’re trying to make it sound.
3.Do i really care about reviews? Thats a bunch of game publishers many of which are paid off’s opinion. Not mine.
4.Halo is overrated as hell. You’ve played any halfway decent fps you’ve played halo.
5.The game reviews are closer to your opinion know what that means? You’re a lame ass cat who follows the sheep. Well gee everyone gives it good reviews! Guess that means I need to. It’s a 8.5 game, not no game to end all games. System shock 2 was a better game then bioshock. Stop crying already because i insult the game.
6.As for saying oblivion’s combat engine sucks, you can do more in there then bioshock and theres more to do then there is in bioshock. A larger mission variety as well, for instance. One mission you’re part of a contest, where you must stay a night in a mansion with a group of people. You are there to assassinate them but there’s multiple ways you can do it. Just run through and kill them, get them to go off by theirselves then kill them one by one or turn them against one another. Even the melee weapons have depth, since the more you level in melee the more attacks you gain such as a backhand stroke,lunging stroke,shield bash, sideways swipes that can disarm opponents. The arrows have realistic physics, and there is more magic then there are plasmids in this game. Oblivion lasts longer, has way more you can do and you can actually create your character. Plus the worlds much longer. But thats your opinion it sucks, doesnt make it fact. Just like its my opinion bioshock sucks. You tell people to look at biased reviews for games then you are not a real gamer.

[Chauncy Talon]

Damn yall to got a discussion that seem like u need to be on Political Incorrect with Bill Maury be funny with Bill Maury he be talkin bout Space Jam and yall be agruin’ bout online games lol

I do not want Trophies, Money or not even a title saying I am number "1". You can have your cheap trophies, paper titles, and dingy headbands. I am a "STORY" to my peers, a "LEGEND" for your kids to hear, and a "FOLKLORE" to keep you from dieing with fear - [b]Calvin D. Kates aka Chauncy "TRU" Talon. [/b]

[J High]

@Tyler Durden 4378 wrote:

1.You climax over the game doesnt mean I do.
2.Did explore, still not that expansive as you’re trying to make it sound.
3.Do i really care about reviews? Thats a bunch of game publishers many of which are paid off’s opinion. Not mine.
4.Halo is overrated as hell. You’ve played any halfway decent fps you’ve played halo.
5.The game reviews are closer to your opinion know what that means? You’re a lame ass cat who follows the sheep. Well gee everyone gives it good reviews! Guess that means I need to. It’s a 8.5 game, not no game to end all games. System shock 2 was a better game then bioshock. Stop crying already because i insult the game.
6.As for saying oblivion’s combat engine sucks, you can do more in there then bioshock and theres more to do then there is in bioshock. A larger mission variety as well, for instance. One mission you’re part of a contest, where you must stay a night in a mansion with a group of people. You are there to assassinate them but there’s multiple ways you can do it. Just run through and kill them, get them to go off by theirselves then kill them one by one or turn them against one another. Even the melee weapons have depth, since the more you level in melee the more attacks you gain such as a backhand stroke,lunging stroke,shield bash, sideways swipes that can disarm opponents. The arrows have realistic physics, and there is more magic then there are plasmids in this game. Oblivion lasts longer, has way more you can do and you can actually create your character. Plus the worlds much longer. But thats your opinion it sucks, doesnt make it fact. Just like its my opinion bioshock sucks. You tell people to look at biased reviews for games then you are not a real gamer.

and thats Mac-Owned….with some cheese on it 😄

GMX on COD!...We get OURS!

[contagion]

@Tyler Durden 4378 wrote:

1.You climax over the game doesnt mean I do.
2.Did explore, still not that expansive as you’re trying to make it sound.
3.Do i really care about reviews? Thats a bunch of game publishers many of which are paid off’s opinion. Not mine.
4.Halo is overrated as hell. You’ve played any halfway decent fps you’ve played halo.
5.The game reviews are closer to your opinion know what that means? You’re a lame ass cat who follows the sheep. Well gee everyone gives it good reviews! Guess that means I need to. It’s a 8.5 game, not no game to end all games. System shock 2 was a better game then bioshock. Stop crying already because i insult the game.
6.As for saying oblivion’s combat engine sucks, you can do more in there then bioshock and theres more to do then there is in bioshock. A larger mission variety as well, for instance. One mission you’re part of a contest, where you must stay a night in a mansion with a group of people. You are there to assassinate them but there’s multiple ways you can do it. Just run through and kill them, get them to go off by theirselves then kill them one by one or turn them against one another. Even the melee weapons have depth, since the more you level in melee the more attacks you gain such as a backhand stroke,lunging stroke,shield bash, sideways swipes that can disarm opponents. The arrows have realistic physics, and there is more magic then there are plasmids in this game. Oblivion lasts longer, has way more you can do and you can actually create your character. Plus the worlds much longer. But thats your opinion it sucks, doesnt make it fact. Just like its my opinion bioshock sucks. You tell people to look at biased reviews for games then you are not a real gamer.

1. You climax over Oblivion doesn’t mean I do.
2. I guess everyones wrong and you’re right, it’s 8.5, every single review site was paid off, does that include this one? I can’t believe that anyone could be so dense and biased as to suggest that because their opinion doesn’t coincide with the majority of reviews that over 50 review sites were all paid off and are all biased.
3. Actually, they’re game reviewers, not publishers. Secondly, you honestly think all the LITTLE sites were paid off? Maybe I could understand saying EGM, GI, or IGN. But if you honestly think that over 50 reviewers were all paid off, then you’re wrong. You just don’t like that the majority of gaming sites and gamers agree with me and not you. No need to make excuses for your opinion being a minority. I don’t make excuses for my opinion on Oblivion being a minority, I don’t say DURR THEY’RE ALL BIASED, I just simply state my personal belief with the knowledge that some people enjoy that game and I’m not one of them.
4. Point?
5. ROFL. Yeah because I agree with reviews based on my own experience with a video game I follow the sheep. I could go ahead and say “WELL OBLIVION GOT GOOD REVIEWS AND YOU’RE JUST FOLLOWING THE SHEEP!” but I’m not so retarded as to make sweeping generalizations that categorize everyone whose opinion happens to coincide with a reviews “a sheep follower”. Bioshock is a 9.5 game and the best single player game on 360.
6. You’re right, my opinion is that Oblivion sucks and you standing up for it will not change it. I played and formed my own opinion based on that experience and if I just enjoyed games based on good reviews, I’d have enjoyed Oblivion. And if you really think that every single review site in existence that reviewed Bioshock was biased then the only biased reviewer is you. I’m not biased for or against any game or system and I judge games based on playing them, not reading about them. I pointed to reviews because, you know, it just seems unlikely that the entire gaming populace is wrong and you’re right. You’re entitled to your own opinion though and I’m well aware that mine won’t change it and that’s okay because yours won’t change mine.

[J High]

^ nice return speech…..this is getting to be better than watching the Presidential Debate 😄

GMX on COD!...We get OURS!

[D BiGGS]

@J High 4406 wrote:

^ nice return speech…..this is getting to be better than watching the Presidential Debate 😄

cosine:eek:
*grabs popcorn*

Still 3 lefts from making the right move;)...

[vect97]

demo was pretty good.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

http://therapreserve.blogspot.com

[Tyler Durden]

@contagion 4391 wrote:

1. You climax over Oblivion doesn’t mean I do.
2. I guess everyones wrong and you’re right, it’s 8.5, every single review site was paid off, does that include this one? I can’t believe that anyone could be so dense and biased as to suggest that because their opinion doesn’t coincide with the majority of reviews that over 50 review sites were all paid off and are all biased.
3. Actually, they’re game reviewers, not publishers. Secondly, you honestly think all the LITTLE sites were paid off? Maybe I could understand saying EGM, GI, or IGN. But if you honestly think that over 50 reviewers were all paid off, then you’re wrong. You just don’t like that the majority of gaming sites and gamers agree with me and not you. No need to make excuses for your opinion being a minority. I don’t make excuses for my opinion on Oblivion being a minority, I don’t say DURR THEY’RE ALL BIASED, I just simply state my personal belief with the knowledge that some people enjoy that game and I’m not one of them.
4. Point?
5. ROFL. Yeah because I agree with reviews based on my own experience with a video game I follow the sheep. I could go ahead and say “WELL OBLIVION GOT GOOD REVIEWS AND YOU’RE JUST FOLLOWING THE SHEEP!” but I’m not so retarded as to make sweeping generalizations that categorize everyone whose opinion happens to coincide with a reviews “a sheep follower”. Bioshock is a 9.5 game and the best single player game on 360.
6. You’re right, my opinion is that Oblivion sucks and you standing up for it will not change it. I played and formed my own opinion based on that experience and if I just enjoyed games based on good reviews, I’d have enjoyed Oblivion. And if you really think that every single review site in existence that reviewed Bioshock was biased then the only biased reviewer is you. I’m not biased for or against any game or system and I judge games based on playing them, not reading about them. I pointed to reviews because, you know, it just seems unlikely that the entire gaming populace is wrong and you’re right. You’re entitled to your own opinion though and I’m well aware that mine won’t change it and that’s okay because yours won’t change mine.

1.Oblivions far from my favorite game, it’s a good game. The storyline sucks ass and it’s overrated as well. I’d give it a 8.8-9. I just cited it earlier as a similar game with more gameplay and replayability.
2.Did I say all were paid off and biased? No. I said many are paid off which is true, as you can find flaws in there ratings system. For instance games that gamestop gets exclusive inside info on before it releases they tend to rate better. And they will ignore huge gaping flaws and only bring up minor stuff like a few lags. Which is bs. Why should I care what reviews have to say? Do their tastes speak for mine? Or for Jhigh or anyone else who puts stock in another man’s opinion? Be a leader not a follower kid.
3.Again where did I say they were all paid off? I said many meaning a portion of the demographic stop putting words in my mouth.
4.Why would you even need to bring up game reviews? What does that prove? I never said you didnt like it, the whole “Well gee! They liked it” Bs is so childish. Thats like with film and music, who cares what reviews anything gets. Howard the duck is a critically panned movie but I like it. That’s your opinion it’s the best on the 360, doesn’t make the shit true. Just like you were pmsing over high preferring rainbow six to gears of war. I prefer Ghost Recon to Gears of war so kick rocks with that bs son.
5.The entire game populace? Right. I never said the game was bad, I said it was good but a better rental then a buy then you started acting like a chick in heat and saying well you didnt explore it, blah blah blah. Have you read EVERY review site in existence? I don’t care what other people think about a game, because Im not them and they have no bearing over my opinion. So please go pick up some tampons for yourself and stop putting words in my mouth kid.

Also as for the majority thinks bs, that’s like saying the majority at one point in america thought of blacks as being subhuman. Doesn’t make the shit true. Bad comparison I know but you get the point.

[Author]

Posts