1.There are more sites then that, and proof? Do you have proof that the sites don’t accept bribes? No. It’s called making an educated guess, you just look at the trends when it comes to ratings. Especially franchises where little changes over the course of the games but they consistently get high ratings despite that and bitch about minor things in some games that exist in other ones but they aren’t brought up. You presume 5 to be. You have proof? No it’s called reasonable doubt.
2.Many times reviews are correct, many times they arent. Why would you even cite as oh it’s popular and other people agree? That doesn’t mean crap, because the halo games consistently get good ratings and they bore the hell out of me. Taste is to the individual, the majority could think any number of things. Doesnt make a good any more or less entertaining untill you come up with your own assumption.
3.I call everyone kid, kid. You’re more then likely older then me and I say don’t follow the sheep because what does bringing up reviews add to an arguement? Everyone looks for different things in games and when I talked about oblivion I never once brought up reviews because they are insignificant.
4.I said ghost recon, not ghost recon 2. I havent played ghost recon 2, you’re the one who when I stated I think bioshock’s overrated got his feelings hurt and tried to ask whether I’ve done this and that and tried to correct me on the number of endings and there are 3 not 2. Why’d I bring up what I did? They have nothing in common but it’s the same train of thought by saying a large number of people adhere to one idea so that means it must be right or more valid because you disagree with the majority. What I said was everybody in the world could climax while playing that game and give it game of a lifetime what does that even mean if people are not into that style of gameplay? Or if the game doesn’t appeal to them? That a large number of review sites are right and they’re wrong? Bs, the zeldia franchise is grossly overrated and I can’t stand that series. I still overall said it was a good game. Game of the year? No, best of all time? Hell no. It has it’s fair share of flaws and I recognized that. Whereas you had to try to pick apart my reasons for saying the game wasn’t all that when Im entitled to my opinion on the game. I wouldn’t have said crap to you untill you tried to make assumptions about me.
Am I getting mad? No, because I really don’t care. I insult everyone so don’t feel special. Evaluate yourself for picking apart my reasons for not being into an overrated game in the first place when I still said it was good, kid.
@contagion 4350 wrote:
Maybe you just didn’t explore enough. I got a ton of shit on the first way through and explored like all hell and purposely took as long as possible to best enjoy myself and the game, I could’ve just ran through in half the time but I chose not to because that’s depriving myself of a great gaming experience. Obviously I’m not alone in that opinion, just look up the Bioshock reviews at http://www.gamerankings.com. And Oblivion is SOOOO WACK. That is the most boring overrated shit I’ve ever seen in my life, hands down. And R6 being better than Gears? Please. The only people who think that are people who are terrible at Gears just like when people hate on Halo cause they suck at it or don’t have a 360. Vegas was not that great and in the end it will be Gears that will be remembered while Vegas will go down as “just another” R6 game. Gears isn’t the best selling 360 game for no reason, it’s just simply the best multiplayer game on the market. And COD4, judging from the beta is going to be the best multiplayer game for awhile once it comes out. Yes, that’s right, better than Halo 3. I wasn’t all that impressed with the beta for Halo 3 but COD4 is like a ridiculously sick modern day version of Counter-Strike.
Bioshock > Oblivion
and
COD4 > Gears > R6VFor anyone who has trouble sleeping just pick up Oblivion and play for more than 5 minutes because the combat system is about as exciting as watching grass grow.
And for anyone who doubts me on Bioshock, just go read the reviews on gamerankings.com, it’s a compilation of all the review scores for a game averaged together for an overall score. Check if more of the reviews seem to agree with my opinion or with Tyler Durdens.
Very ironic post for someone who spoke on me jumping to conclusions. The only people who think r6 is better then gow suck at the game? Or wait what about people who don’t like Halo? You do this even more then I do kid. Then you say anyone who doubts you on bioshock to go read the reviews and see whose opinion they are closer to? Lol, you’re funny. That’s putting emphasis on reviews right there not just using it as a point of reference. How a game will be remembered? Or how much a game sells? Pathetic.